baltimoreklion.blogg.se

Firefox esr 17.0
Firefox esr 17.0











firefox esr 17.0
  1. #FIREFOX ESR 17.0 UPGRADE#
  2. #FIREFOX ESR 17.0 SOFTWARE#
  3. #FIREFOX ESR 17.0 WINDOWS#

Gut house but forgot to upgrade wiring/plumbing? by paolo Google Flags Him as Criminal, Notifies Police by antdude China Owned TikTok to Partner with Federal Voting Assistance Program by Cartel

  • FCC Approves Lumen 20-State Sale, Deal to Close Soon + more notable news.
  • From Ligado To Verizon To Dish, Spectrum Conflicts Continue Brewing + more notable news.
  • #FIREFOX ESR 17.0 SOFTWARE#

    It's all about CHOICE, that and FLEXIBILITY, with regard to our UI's.Īustralis is just a symptom of a larger general dysfunction of late, between the software execs/devs, and their loyal and sometimes even PAYING (as in the case of Microsoft) users.

    firefox esr 17.0

    Unless it changes the next ESR will be based on Firefox 31.0 release. The next 24 esr will be 24.3.0esr when Firefox 27.0 is Released on Feb 4th. THAT was the deal-breaker for ME, along with the forced Tabs on Top.įortunately, CTR can put back the flexibility, and then, if I don't choose another non-Australis browser anyway, I could still try out the Australis elements at my OWN pace, or not, as part of CTR's choices seem to include choosing to let things look like Australis too, one piece at a time. The current ESR is based on the 24.0 Release as the current 24.2.0esr was released inline with the current 26.0 Release (before it was 24.1.1esr inline 25.0.1 release). That brings me to my biggest beef with Australis :įF devs took away some of the long-standing legacy toolbar icons (not just hiding them in the Customize screen) and made others impossible to move, by tying them to the URL/address box. The Add-on bar I too never used, as it takes away from web page vertical space, and anything which might go there has in the past always been able to be moved to another of the bars. It's programmers' whims and arrogant "we know best" attitude, nothing more nor less, and those are extremely flimsy reasons, in MY book.Īs for the rounded tabs, that's not a biggie for me, though square ones DO let more characters of text be displayed on them. There is no productivity-driven reason, else I would give the tabs move a fair chance. There are many more differences in going to Australis from pre than you mentioned, for anyone who, like I have, kept holding onto earlier UI layouts as long as we could.Īnd after more than a decade of my tabs not being on top, why the blazes should I be forced to change NOW ?! THAT is what is driving folks away from FireFox, instead of flexibility, the reason that we embraced FF in its early days. (CVE-2013-0801) - It is possible to call a content level constructor that allows for the constructor to have chrome privileged access.

    #FIREFOX ESR 17.0 WINDOWS#

    But that's just me.Īs I and selected others here continually preach, forced changes (in general) with no internal menu-driven way to choose to revert to the earlier way - THAT is the problem - and it's the same with Windows 8's UI. The installed version of Firefox ESR 17.x is earlier than 17.0.6 and is, therefore, potentially affected by the following vulnerabilities : - Various memory safety issues exist. Rounded Tabs & having them on top doesn't seem like much to fuss over. Frankly I still don't see what the fuss over Australis is about.













    Firefox esr 17.0